ArticleHeliyon2024
Establishment of cross-priming amplification for point-of-care detection of
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of Anyplex™ MTB/NTM, Xpert MTB/RIF ultra, culture, and microscopy for the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis using gastric aspirates.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2026Article
- IoT-integrated and portable real-time LAMP platform with hydroxy naphthol blue (HNB) for universal, low-cost pathogen detection in resource-limited settings.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Advances in rapid detection technologies for zoonotic diseases: a one health-oriented review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Rapid identification of majorFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To simplify sputum sample preparation steps and achieve point-of-care testing (POCT) of Methods: Evaluate the liquefying ability of high-concentration guanidine thiocyanate (GTC) for sputum and the effectiveness of MTB inactivation; establish a rapid detection system for MTB and NTM based on CPA technology using EasyNAT integrated detection tubes, with the left amplification zone specific to MTB CPA amplification and the right amplification zone specific to both MTB and NTM CPA amplification. Suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients or patients diagnosed as suspected NTM pulmonary infections specimens collected from the Second Hospital of Longyan, Fujian Province, from September 2022 to September 2023, acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and CPA-POCT were performed. The kappa coefficients was used to evaluate the consistency between the RT-PCR and CPA-POCT. Results: The liquefaction effect of 6M GTC on sputum was equivalent to 4 % NaOH, and no MTB growth was observed in the Lowenstein-Jensen medium of sputum samples treated with 6M GTC incorporating the H37Rv strain. The newly established CPA-POCT method showed good agreement with RT-PCR with a positive compliance rate of 86.27 %, a negative compliance rate of 89.36 %, an overall compliance rate of 87.75 %, and a Kappa coefficients of 0.786 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: 6M GTC can liquefy sputum and render MTB non-viable, eliminating the need for Mycobacterium nucleic acid testing in BSL-2 laboratories; the newly established CPA method can rapidly and accurately distinguish MTB and NTM in the form of POCT, with simple and fast operation, suitable for promotion and application in grassroots medical institutions and remote rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.