ArticleHeliyon2024
Deciphering the role of plasticizers and solvent systems in hydrophobic polymer coating on hydrophilic core.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The type of plasticizer and the choice of solvent or co-solvents used for coating of a hydrophilic core can greatly impact the permeability, porosity, and mechanical strength of the polymer film. Although, Ethylcellulose (EC) is an old polymer, it is a polymer of choice for modifying the drug release due to its inherent properties. The ability of polymers like EC alone to form a diffusion-controlling membrane with good mechanical properties is limited. To modulate the drug release as per the desired profile and modify the film properties, ethylcellulose is often used with hydrophilic hypromellose (HPMC) along with plasticizers. The main focus of the current study was the identification of an appropriate solvent system and plasticizer for the ethylcellulose-hypromellose polymer combination. The study evaluated the coating solution properties, the feasibility and efficiency of the process, the physical attributes of the tablet, the surface properties of the polymer film, the in-vitro drug release and behavior, and the impact of curing time on surface properties and drug release, among other factors. The isopropyl alcohol-water mixture (9:1) produced a homogeneous film in comparison to films produced by other solvents. Although both hydrophilic and hydrophobic plasticizers produce homogeneous films, hydrophilic plasticizers have a higher rate of drug diffusion than hydrophobic plasticizers. During the tablet curing and stability study, the drug release from the polymeric film coating with triethyl citrate decreased moderately and with polyethylene glycol decreased significantly. The presence of hydrophobic plasticizers, viz., dibutyl sebacate and acetyl tributyl citrate, in the polymeric film coating does not impact drug release. For the combination of ethylcellulose and hypromellose, it was found that a mixture of isopropyl alcohol and water (9:1) worked better as a solvent for coating solutions, and hydrophobic plasticizers lower the risk associated with coating ethylcellulose and hypromellose together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.