ArticleHeliyon2024
Understanding metaverse adoption in education: The extended UTAUMT model.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of traditional and metaverse-based education: impacts on students' all-round development.BMC psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The metaverse, an immersive virtual environment enabling users to engage with digital experiences, has the potential to revolutionize education. However, research pertaining to this area is still in its early stages. This study investigates the variables that influence the acceptance of educational metaverses and the intention to use them. It also presents an expanded model called the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Metaverse Technology (UTAUMT) to provide guidance to educators and decision-makers. The study involved 253 Vietnamese teachers and students who had experience with metaverse, selected through purposive sampling. The UTAUMT provides a comprehensive framework that encompasses various factors, including metaverse performance expectancy (MPE), metaverse effort expectancy (MEE), metaverse social influence (MSI), metaverse hedonic motivation (MHM), metaverse price value (MPC), metaverse self-efficacy (MSE), and metaverse facilitating conditions (MFC). These factors were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. The findings indicate that MEE, MSI, MFC, MSE, and MBI have a considerable impact on the educational metaverse MUB. The extended UTAUMT model makes a theoretical contribution by including metaverse-specific elements into the technology acceptance framework. The managerial implications focus on the integration of the metaverse, training of users, and providing support to enhance the adoption rate. This study explores the elements that contribute to the adoption of metaverse technology in education and contributes to the existing literature on the acceptance of metaverse technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.