ArticleHeliyon2024
A 3D printed serrated contact structure triboelectric nanogenerator for swimming training safety monitoring.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The wearable electronic devices integrated with 3D printing have attracted much attention, but the continuous power supply demand and limited application scenarios have limited their development. Here, we propose a 3D printed serrated contact structure triboelectric nanogenerator (S-TENG) designed for mechanical energy harvesting and swimming training safety monitoring. Leveraging the advancements in 3D printing technology, we created a flexible, lightweight sensor integrated with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) films on a serrated substrate. This configuration enhances the contact surface area, leading to a significant improvement in energy harvesting efficiency compared to flat structures. Specifically, the serrated structure resulted in a 64 %, 63 %, and 47 % increase in open-circuit voltage (V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.