Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416779›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Long-term efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a propensity score matching analysis in the multicenter REVEAL cohort study.

Mayu Shiomi, Ryu Watanabe, Shogo Matsuda, Takuya Kotani, Ayana Okazaki, Yuichi Masuda, Tsuneyasu Yoshida, Mikihito Shoji, Ryosuke Tsuge, Keiichiro Kadoba and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Real-world outcomes and corticosteroid sparing with mepolizumab for EGPA or HES.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mayu ShiomiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ryu WatanabeDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shogo MatsudaDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Takuya KotaniDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Ayana OkazakiDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Yuichi MasudaDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Tsuneyasu YoshidaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Mikihito ShojiDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryosuke TsugeDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Keiichiro KadobaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryosuke HiwaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Wataru YamamotoDepartment of Health Information Management, Kurashiki Sweet Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Akitoshi TakedaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiaki ItohDepartment of Neurology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Motomu HashimotoDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mepolizumab (MPZ) has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA); however, few studies compare the disease course between patients treated with MPZ (MPZ group) and those who were not treated with MPZ (non-MPZ group) in real-world settings. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the disease course and outcomes between the two groups and assess the long-term efficacy of MPZ in a multicenter cohort in Japan. Methods: We enrolled 113 EGPA patients registered in the cohort until June 2023. Data on clinical characteristics, disease activity, organ damage, treatments, and outcomes were retrospectively collected. To minimize potential confounding factors, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM). Results: After PSM, 37 pairs of matched patients were identified. Clinical characteristics, including age at disease onset, sex, disease duration at last observation, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity at disease onset, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) at disease onset, and Five-factor score at disease onset, were comparable between the groups. The median BVAS at the last observation was 0 in both groups; however, more cases in the non-MPZ group exhibited elevated BVAS, resulting in a significantly higher BVAS in the non-MPZ group at the last observation (median; MPZ group: 0, non-MPZ group: 0, p=0.028). The MPZ group had significantly lower glucocorticoid (GC) doses at the last observation (median; MPZ group: 4 mg/day, non-MPZ group: 5 mg/day, p=0.011), with a higher proportion achieving a GC dose ≤ 4 mg/day at the last observation (MPZ group: 51.4%, non-MPZ group: 24.2%, p=0.027). Three models of multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with GC doses ≤ 4 mg/day at the last observation. In all models, achieving a GC dose ≤ 4 mg/day was positively associated with MPZ administration and inversely associated with asthma at disease onset. Finally, we evaluated the survival rates between the groups, and the 5-year survival rates were significantly higher in the MPZ group compared to the non-MPZ group (MPZ group: 100%, non-MPZ group: 81.3%, p=0.012). Conclusion: Mepolizumab not only contributes to disease activity control but also reduces the GC dose, which may lead to improved survival in EGPA patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedPropensity ScoreAdultAgedChurg-Strauss SyndromeCohort StudiesFemaleGranulomatosis with PolyangiitisHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedmepolizumabeosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitisglucocorticoid-sparingmepolizumabmulticenter cohortsurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID39416779
PMCPMC11479934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.