Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416761›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

Ureter-ileum-interposition: Combined experience from two high-volume centres.

Maksym Pikul, David Pfister, Constantin Rieger, Christian Bach, Oleg Voylenko, Oleksandr Stakhovskyi, Sofiya Semko, Iurii Vitruk, Oleksii Kononenko, Eduard Stakhovsky and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maksym PikulDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1590-235X
David PfisterDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3925-9653
Constantin RiegerDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3993-7974
Christian BachDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne Germany.
Oleg VoylenkoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine.
Oleksandr StakhovskyiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine.
Sofiya SemkoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine.
Iurii VitrukDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine.
Oleksii KononenkoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine.
Eduard StakhovskyDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology National Cancer Institute of Ukraine Kyiv Ukraine.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne University Cologne Cologne Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2511-3664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aimed to evaluate short- and long-term complication rates and functional outcomes in a substantial cohort of patients undergoing ileal ureter interposition at two high-volume medical centres. Materials and methods: A retrospective single-arm analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ureter reconstruction using ileum between 2003 and 2022 at the University Clinic of Cologne and the National Cancer Institute of Ukraine. Data on aetiology, surgical techniques, pre- and postoperative kidney function changes, readmission rates and complication management were collected. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula. Results: Results revealed 107 cases with consistent data. Within 90 days post-surgery, 53% experienced complications, mainly graded as I-II. Grade III complications were seen in 13%, with two cases of grade IV complications leading to extended hospitalisation and patient death. The 90-day mortality rate was 1.8%. Over a mean follow-up of 52 months, clinically significant vesico-renal refluxes occurred in 28%, with only 5.4% leading to persistent urinary tract infection. Antireflux techniques appeared to reduce urine upflow incidence compared with conventional interposition. Anastomosis stricture occurred in 15% of patients, with 63% requiring permanent re-stenting and 37% needing re-anastomosis. Metabolic acidosis was clinically significant in 7.5% of cases. A slight improvement in renal function was observed during the first year post-surgery (average postoperative eGFR = 76 ± 22 ml/min; Mann-Witney Conclusion: Ileal ureter interposition demonstrated a favourable safety profile and functional outcomes. This surgical intervention provides an effective tension-free bypass, irrespective of healthy ureter length.

Indexed as

complex kidney tumoursindications to partial nephrectomynephrometryorgan‐sparing managementrenal‐cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39416761
PMCPMC11479808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.