ArticleBJUI compass2024
Machine learning analysis for detecting late recurrence and loss to follow-up after renal cell carcinoma surgery.
Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable machine learning models for bladder cancer overall survival prediction development and external validation via SEER database and Chinese cohort analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Gradient Boosting Machine-Based Prognostic Model with SurvSHAP Analysis for Predicting Secondary Loss of Response to Infliximab Therapy in Crohn's Disease.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning models to predict survival in esophageal cancer: a study based on the SEER database and external validation in China.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Machine learning analysis for detecting late recurrence and loss to follow-up after renal cell carcinoma surgery.BJUI compass · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2024
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is shown to have a tendency for late recurrence, occurring 5 or more years after curative surgery. Imaging diagnosis is required for follow-up, and there is no definitive answer as to how long this should continue. Some patients discontinue follow-up visits at their own discretion. How best to predict late recurrence and loss to follow-up (LF) remains unclear. Patients and methods: This study targeted patients diagnosed with non-metastatic RCC who underwent either radical or partial nephrectomy at Chiba University Hospital between 1988 and 2021. Follow-up for patients with RCC is typically lifelong. We used random survival forests (RSFs), a machine learning-based survival analysis method, to predict late recurrence and LF. For verification of prediction accuracy, we applied the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (t-AUC). To analyse the risks of late recurrence and LF, SurvSHAP(t) and partial dependence plots were used. Results: We analysed 1051 cases in this study. Median follow-up was 58.5 (range: 0-376) months. The predictive accuracy of recurrence using RSF was t-AUC 0.806, 0.761, 0.674 and 0.566 at 60, 120, 180 and 240 months postoperatively, respectively. The recurrence risk impact showed a time-dependent increase up to approximately 50 months postoperatively. Beyond 50 months, there were no distinct risk factors characteristic of late recurrence. The predictive accuracy of LF using RSF was t-AUC 0.542, 0.699, 0.685, 0.628 and 0.674 at 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 months postoperatively, respectively. The risk of LF increased with advancing age beyond 70 years. Conclusion: It is difficult to identify factors that predict late recurrence. For long-term follow-up observation, it is essential to pay particular attention to patients with RCC aged 70 years and above. Establishing frameworks to facilitate collaboration with local hospitals near patients' residences and providing care within the community is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.