ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2024
Motivations behind complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-derived tissue slice cultures from endoscopic biopsies as a translational ex vivo model for inflammatory bowel diseases.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of complementary and integrative medicine use in inflammatory bowel disease: a focus on probiotics, prebiotics, and fermentable dietary fibres.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and impacts compliance with conventional treatment. Gastroenterologists should understand the motivational factors of CAM use-factors that Methods: Retrospective cohort survey of patients over 18 years old with IBD, evaluated by gastroenterologists at a tertiary care referral centre from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Only patients who reported CAM use were included. Chi-square and independent Results: Of the 230 completed surveys, 193 reported CAM use (CD: 57.5% vs UC: 42.5%). Demographics, disease duration, and hospitalizations were similar, but CD patients had lower SIBDQ scores (CD: 48.1 vs UC: 53.5, Conclusion: Despite differences in QoL, push and pull motivations for CAM use did not differ between CD and UC patients. Most users do not feel well informed of CAM and ongoing dialogue is important for patient-centred care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.