Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416695›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024

Organ-on-chip technology: Opportunities and challenges.

Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Guo Wei Foo, Nikhil Aggarwal, Matthew Wook Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Exploring endometriosis through 3DMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Improve your success with fish cell lines-small things that matter.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Application ofFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Santosh Kumar SrivastavaNUS Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation (SynCTI), National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Guo Wei FooNUS Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation (SynCTI), National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Nikhil AggarwalNUS Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation (SynCTI), National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Matthew Wook ChangNUS Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation (SynCTI), National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ-on-chip (OOC) technology is an innovative approach that reproduces human organ structures and functions on microfluidic platforms, offering detailed insights into intricate physiological processes. This technology provides unique advantages over conventional in vitro and in vivo models and thus has the potential to become the new standard for biomedical research and drug screening. In this mini-review, we compare OOCs with conventional models, highlighting their differences, and present several applications of OOCs in biomedical research. Additionally, we highlight advancements in OOC technology, particularly in developing multiorgan systems, and discuss the challenges and future directions of this field.

Indexed as

2D/3D culture modelsGut-on-ChipKidney-on-chipLiver-on-chipLung-on-chipMicrofluidicsOrgans-on-chips (OOCs)

Identifiers

PMID39416695
PMCPMC11446384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.