ArticleTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2024
Exploring the clinical factors affecting lithium dose and plasma level and the effect of brand.
Article in Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optimal use of lithium involves adjustment of the dose, to keep the plasma level within the narrow, recommended range. Brand-specific prescribing has long been considered critical to achieving this aim, but this is a convention based on very limited data. Objectives: To explore the effect of selected demographic and clinical factors on the relationship between lithium dose and plasma level and determine whether there is an independent effect of lithium brand. Design: Analysis of clinical audit data collected in 2023 as part of a quality improvement programme addressing the use of lithium, conducted by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health. Methods: Data were collected from clinical records using a bespoke proforma, submitted online and analysed using SPSS. Results: Data were submitted for 4405 patients who had been prescribed solid-dosage formulations of lithium for more than a year. Priadel Conclusion: Our findings replicate those of previous studies with respect to the demographic and clinical variables that can be expected to influence lithium dosage in routine clinical practice. This reinforces the need to titrate the dosage for each individual patient, to achieve and maintain the target plasma level. However, the findings suggest that the Priadel and Camcolit brands of lithium are essentially interchangeable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.