ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024
Management of early recurrence following successful endoscopic detorsion in sigmoid volvulus.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of recurrence and mortality rates between resection and non-resection surgical methods for treating sigmoid volvulus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Derotation in Colonic Volvulus Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The effects of endoscopic procedures and flatus tube application on early recurrence following endoscopic detorsion in sigmoid volvulus: Review of 792 patients.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Emergency primary anastomosis with or without intraoperative colonic lavage following sigmoidectomy in sigmoid volvulus: 175-patient experience in a tertiary referral hospital.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Following endoscopic detorsion, sigmoid volvulus (SV) recurs in 3%-86% of patients, approximately 13% of which are early recurrence presenting during the first admission period. Although semielective surgery is the traditional approach, elective surgery following repetitive endoscopy or percutaneous endoscopic sigmoidopexy (PES) are other alternatives in the management of early SV recurrence. Our aim was to discuss the role of semielective surgery in above-mentioned rare clinical entity. Methods: Among our 1,076-case series, we retrospectively evaluated the records of 612 patients (56.9%) treated between June 1966 and June 1986, while we prospectively utilized the data of 464 patients (43.1%) managed between June 1986 and January 2024. We recorded the treatment option and prognosis for each patient. Results: Early SV recurrence was determined in 34 (5.5%) of the 621 patients with successful nonoperative detorsion. We treated all of these patients by semielective surgery. The surgical procedures were detorsion in one patient (2.9%), mesopexy in 11 (32.4%), sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis in 17 (50.0%), and sigmoidectomy with stoma in five (14.7%). In this series, mortality and morbidity rates were 2.9% (one patient) and 14.7% (five patients), respectively. Conclusion: Semielective surgery is the traditional approach tried by most surgeons, which allows for the recovery of the general status of the patients, bowel preparation, and antibiotic prophylaxis. However, repetitive endoscopy followed by elective surgery or PES are current alternatives for some selected patients. Unfortunately, the relatively low effectuation rate of elective surgery following successful repetitive endoscopic detorsion and recurrence-related poor prognosis are still important handicaps of the latter procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.