ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024
Comparison between modified and conventional combined Trabeculotomy-Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin-C for intraocular pressure reduction in primary congenital glaucoma.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the efficacy of modified combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy (CTT) with mitomycin-C (MMC) versus conventional CTT with MMC for intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). Methods: This interventional study was carried out in The Institute of Ophthalmology, Lahore from January 2018 to June 2019. We included 70 patients of either gender, with the age range from birth to ten years and with PCG having IOP >30 mm Hg. These patients were divided in groups A and B with 35 patients in each group. Patients in Group-A underwent modified CTT with MMC and in Group-B conventional CTT with MMC was carried out. Results: The mean age of our patients was 15.17 ± 12.39 months. Regarding gender, 57 (81.4%) were males and 13 (18.6%) were females. Baseline mean IOP in Group-A was 32.49 ± 1.01 mm Hg whereas in Group-B mean IOP was 31.97 ± 1.04 mm Hg. After one month, the mean IOP was 27.60 ± 1.72 mm Hg in Group-A, whereas mean IOP was 27.40 ± 1.82 mmHg in Group-B. After three months, the mean IOP was 21.63 ± 1.09 mm Hg in Group-A, whereas 20.97 ± 1.12 mm Hg in Group-B. In Group-A efficacy was achieved in 14 (40%) patients whereas in Group-B efficacy was achieved in 25 (71.4%) patients. Conclusion: Our study revealed that conventional CTT with MMC showed better efficacy than modified CTT with MMC for reduction of IOP in PCG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.