Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416553›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects.

Wafaa Harfaoui, Mustapha Alilou, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib, Saad Zidouh, Aziz Zentar, Brahim Lekehal, Lahcen Belyamani, Majdouline Obtel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reshaping Anesthesia with Artificial Intelligence: From Concept to Reality.Anesthesia and critical care (Houston, Tex.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wafaa HarfaouiEpidemiology and Public Health, Laboratory of Community Health, Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR.
Mustapha AlilouIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Ibn Sina, Rabat, MAR.
Ahmed Rhassane El AdibFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, MAR.
Saad ZidouhFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR.
Aziz ZentarDirection, Military Nursing School of Rabat, Rabat, MAR.
Brahim LekehalVascular Surgery, Ibn Sina University Hospital Center, Rabat, MAR.
Lahcen BelyamaniMohammed VI Foundation of Health Sciences, Mohammed VI University, Rabat, MAR.
Majdouline ObtelEpidemiology and Public Health, Laboratory of Community Health, Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, MAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthesiology is considered a complex medical specialty. Its history has been marked by radical advances and profound transformations, owing to technical and pharmacological developments and innovations in the field, enabling us over the years to improve patient outcomes and perform longer, more complex surgical procedures on more fragile patients. However, anesthesiology has never been safe and free of challenges. Despite the advances made, it still faces risks associated with the practice of anesthesia, for both patients and healthcare professionals, and with some of the specific challenges encountered in low and middle-income countries. In this context, certain actions and initiatives must be carried out collaboratively. In addition, recent technologies and innovations such as simulation, genomics, artificial intelligence, and robotics hold promise for further improving patient safety in anesthesiology and overcoming existing challenges, making it possible to offer safer, more effective, and personalized anesthesia. However, this requires rigorous monitoring of ethical aspects and the reliability of the studies to reap the full benefits of the new technology. This literature review presents the evolution of anesthesiology over time, its current challenges, and its promising future. It underlines the importance of the new technologies and the need to pursue efforts and strengthen research in anesthesiology to overcome the persistent challenges and benefit from the advantages of the latest technology to guarantee safe, high-quality anesthesia with universal access.

Indexed as

anesthesiologyartificial intelligencechallenges and inequalities of accessfuture prospectslow and middle-income countriespatient safetyprogress in anesthesiologytechnological advances

Identifiers

PMID39416553
PMCPMC11482646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.