ReviewCureus2024
A Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Advances in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in Clinical Research for Nerve Injuries (Nerve SPACE 2025).Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Hydrogels for Peripheral Nerve Repair: Emerging Materials and Therapeutic Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) pose significant clinical challenges due to their complex healing processes and the often incomplete functional recovery. This review and bibliometric analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of advancements in peripheral nerve regeneration research, focusing on trends, influential studies, and emerging areas. By analyzing 2921 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection, key themes such as nerve regeneration, repair, and the critical role of Schwann cells were identified. The study highlights a notable increase in research output since the early 2000s, with China and the United States leading in publication volume and citations. The analysis also underscores the importance of collaborative networks, which are driving innovation in this field. Despite significant progress, the challenge of achieving complete functional recovery from PNIs persists, emphasizing the need for continued research into novel therapeutic strategies. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the mechanisms of nerve regeneration, including the roles of cellular and molecular processes, neurotrophic factors, and emerging therapeutic approaches such as gene therapy and stem cell applications. Additionally, the study revealed the use of nanotechnology, biomaterials, and advanced imaging techniques, which hold promise for improving the outcomes of nerve repair. This bibliometric analysis not only maps the landscape of peripheral nerve regeneration research but also identifies opportunities for future investigation. This study has some limitations, including reliance on the Web of Science Core Collection, which may exclude relevant research from other databases. The analysis is predominantly English-based, potentially overlooking significant non-English studies. Citation trends might be influenced by shifting research priorities and accessibility issues, affecting the visibility of older work. Additionally, geographical disparities and limited collaboration networks may restrict the global applicability and knowledge exchange in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.