ArticleCureus2024
Veno-Arterial-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Patient Undergoing Dialysis and Having Cardiopulmonary Failure Due to Coronavirus Disease: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), a viral infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, was first reported in China in December 2019 and has since become a global pandemic. COVID-19 is a multisystem disease with respiratory symptoms as the main presentation. There is growing awareness of the adverse prognostic impact of cardiovascular involvement caused by COVID-19. We report a case of a patient on hemodialysis with COVID-19 who developed cardiopulmonary failure and was successfully weaned off veno-arterial-venous (VAV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A 54-year-old man was brought to our intensive care unit (ICU) with respiratory failure due to COVID-19, which had been diagnosed based on antigen testing results. Three days prior, he had started taking dexamethasone orally, but his respiratory distress had worsened two days prior, and he was referred to our hospital. He had a history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure, and end-stage renal disease. He was found to have circulatory shock and severe hypoxemia, and computed tomography (CT) showed ground-glass opacities throughout the lung fields. Hypoxemia persisted after ventilation. The ventilation settings for this patient were volume control ventilation, fraction of inspiratory oxygen 100%, tidal volume 360 ml, respiratory rate 22 breaths per minute, and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 mmHg. Therefore, veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) was initiated. Echocardiography showed right ventricular free-wall motion disorder, which was judged to be a complication of cardiogenic shock due to septic cardiomyopathy. The patient was switched to VAV-ECMO, after which his circulatory and respiratory insufficiency gradually improved. He was switched to VV-ECMO on day 7 of hospitalization and weaned off ECMO on day 15 of hospitalization. The patient was fully weaned off the ventilator on day 37 of hospitalization and discharged from the ICU on day 38 of hospitalization. COVID-19 can cause cardiomyopathy, a rare cardiovascular disorder that can lead to cardiogenic shock; however, the cardiac and pulmonary symptoms may not occur simultaneously. Therefore, switching to VAV-ECMO after VV-ECMO was introduced; however, it is important to note that the mortality rate associated with this procedure is high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.