ArticleCureus2024
Photosensitivity-Induced Pediatric Rash Following Surgery: A Case Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photosensitivity is characterized by an abnormal skin reaction to light that causes various adverse skin reactions such as blistering, redness, and inflammation. Photosensitivity may also depend on the wavelength of the light as minor changes affect different layers of the skin. During surgical procedures, many different types of light are used with a range of wavelengths. Some of these illumination sources include light-emitting diode lights, xenon light, and many others. This case study examines the occurrence of a photosensitivity reaction in a patient by considering the length, duration, and type of light during surgery. Our patient is a four-year-old male who presented to University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB) with phimosis and umbilical hernia. The patient underwent umbilical herniorrhaphy and circumcision. The patient received general anesthesia via inhalation for both induction and maintenance. The patient's vitals were stable before and after performing the procedure. After completion of the procedure, the patient appeared to have a red rash along the left side of his upper thigh and lower groin area. There were no other complications from the surgery and the procedure was successful. Thus, it was presumed as an erythematous skin burn caused by the operating room (OR) lights. The findings in this case demonstrate a novel finding of a sunburn-like rash caused by the OR lights. Further research is indicated to determine other risk factors such as the type of light being used in the OR, the distance of the light to the exposed skin (which may vary based on surgeon preference), and the duration of time that the lights were used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.