ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Significance of apparent diffusion coefficient in diagnosis of rectal carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preoperative prediction of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer using a combined T2-weighted imaging radiomics and volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram model.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a quantitative parameter that facilitates the detection and reliable differentiation of rectal cancer. MR differentiation between rectal carcinoma, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectal wall with the ADC values and their comparison depending on the level of tumor markers and pathohistological characteristics of rectal carcinoma. Methods: The retrospective study performed at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina included 300 patients, 100 each with rectal cancer, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectum. Mean ADC values were obtained by measuring the region of interest (ROI) of the rectal wall. Results: Rectal cancer showed lower ADC values (0.665 ± 0.086 x 10 Discussion: The ADC is a useful marker in differentiating between rectal cancer, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectal wall with high sensitivity and specificity, but it cannot be used to distinguish the histological grades of rectal cancer, nor other pathohistological parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.