Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416446›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Synthetic biology landscape and community in Germany.

Nicolas Krink, Anne C Löchner, Hendrik Cooper, Chase L Beisel, Barbara Di Ventura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Engineered microbial consortia for next-generation feedstocks.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  3. Organ-on-chip technology: Opportunities and challenges.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Synthetic biology landscape in the UK.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolas KrinkCo-founder German Association for Synthetic Biology, Germany.
Anne C LöchnerCo-founder German Association for Synthetic Biology, Germany.
Hendrik CooperSteering Committee German Association for Synthetic Biology, Germany.
Chase L BeiselAdvisory Board German Association for Synthetic Biology, Germany.
Barbara Di VenturaAdvisory Board German Association for Synthetic Biology, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its start in the early 2000s, synthetic biology is still overall perceived as a young discipline. In some countries, such as the US, synthetic biology is academically and industrially established, while in others, including Germany, it is still an upcoming field of research. Issues with funding schemes, commercial translation of technologies, public perception, and regulations need to be addressed to establish synthetic biology as a key discipline of the 21

Indexed as

AssociationCommunityEuropeGermanyResearch landscapeScience communicationScience & politicsSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID39416446
PMCPMC11446370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.