ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Machine learning derived model for the prediction of bleeding in dual antiplatelet therapy patients.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antithrombotic Therapy After PCI in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients: Navigating Complexity Beyond Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Redefining Dual Antiplatelet Strategies After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights from Recent RCTs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Thrombocythemia Risk During Third Generation Cephalosporin Therapy.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Drug-Coated Cardiovascular Devices: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Bleeding in Antiplatelet Therapy: A Narrative Review of Clinical Evidence and the Roles of Pharmacists and Nurses.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting bleeding risk in patients with pulmonary embolism.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Risk Stratification for Cephalosporin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Predictive Model in Older Adults.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a predictive model for assessing bleeding risk in dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) patients. Methods: A total of 18,408 DAPT patients were included. Data on patients' demographics, clinical features, underlying diseases, past history, and laboratory examinations were collected from Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The patients were randomly divided into two groups in a proportion of 7:3, with the most used for model development and the remaining for internal validation. LASSO regression, multivariate logistic regression, and six machine learning models, including random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor imputing (KNN), decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), were used to develop prediction models. Model prediction performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), clinical impact curve (CIC), and net reduction curve (NRC). Results: The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest AUC. The model features were comprised of seven clinical variables, including: HGB, PLT, previous bleeding, cerebral infarction, sex, Surgical history, and hypertension. A nomogram was developed based on seven variables. The AUC of the model was 0.861 (95% CI 0.847-0.875) in the development cohort and 0.877 (95% CI 0.856-0.898) in the validation cohort, indicating that the model had good differential performance. The results of calibration curve analysis showed that the calibration curve of this nomogram model was close to the ideal curve. The clinical decision curve also showed good clinical net benefit of the nomogram model. Conclusions: This study successfully developed a predictive model for estimating bleeding risk in DAPT patients. It has the potential to optimize treatment planning, improve patient outcomes, and enhance resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.