Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416362›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

Should we be afraid of radiotherapy for hemorrhagic brain metastases? A narrative review.

Aleksandra Łupicka, Weronika Kowalczyk, Bartosz Cyman, Mateusz Spałek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aleksandra ŁupickaThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Weronika KowalczykThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Bartosz CymanThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz SpałekThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Wilhelma Konrada Roentgena 5, Warsaw 02-781, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3960-7673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial malignancies. They are responsible for death as well as impairment of quality of life and cognitive function. In some cases, BMs can cause intracranial hemorrhage, which is not only responsible for the acute onset of either a new focal neurological deficit or worsening of a preexisting focal deficit but also poses a new challenge in treatment planning and clinical management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the available treatment modalities and their efficacy in hemorrhagic brain metastases (HBMs) with special attention to radiotherapy. In this review, we searched PubMed, BMJ, NCBI, Springer, BMC Cancer, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for articles containing data on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HBMs, excluding the pediatric population. Treatment strategies consist of neurosurgery, whole brain radiotherapy, and stereotactic techniques (fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS)/stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)). Although the optimal treatment strategy for HBMs has not been established, we found no convincing evidence that radiotherapy, especially fSRS/SRS, is contraindicated in HBMs. We concluded that fSRS/SRS is a promising option for patients with HBM, particularly when surgical intervention poses risks.

Indexed as

brain metastasesfractionated radiotherapyGamma Knifehemorrhagic brain metastasesradiotherapystereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID39416362
PMCPMC11481081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.