Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416361›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Deep learning architecture for scatter estimation in cone-beam computed tomography head imaging with varying field-of-measurement settings.

Harshit Agrawal, Ari Hietanen, Simo Särkkä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harshit AgrawalAalto University, Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation (EEA), Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-1429
Ari HietanenPlanmeca Oy., Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1944-423X
Simo SärkkäAalto University, Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation (EEA), Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-9354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: X-ray scatter causes considerable degradation in the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image quality. To estimate the scatter, deep learning-based methods have been demonstrated to be effective. Modern CBCT systems can scan a wide range of field-of-measurement (FOM) sizes. Variations in the size of FOM can cause a major shift in the scatter-to-primary ratio in CBCT. However, the scatter estimation performance of deep learning networks has not been extensively evaluated under varying FOMs. Therefore, we train the state-of-the-art scatter estimation neural networks for varying FOMs and develop a method to utilize FOM size information to improve performance. Approach: We used FOM size information as additional features by converting it into two channels and then concatenating it to the encoder of the networks. We compared our approach for a U-Net, Spline-Net, and DSE-Net, by training them with and without the FOM information. We utilized a Monte Carlo-simulated dataset to train the networks on 18 FOM sizes and test on 30 unseen FOM sizes. In addition, we evaluated the models on the water phantoms and real clinical CBCT scans. Results: The simulation study demonstrates that our method reduced average mean-absolute-percentage-error for U-Net by 38%, Spline-Net by 40%, and DSE-net by 33% for the scatter estimation in the 2D projection domain. Furthermore, the root-mean-square error on the 3D reconstructed volumes was improved for U-Net by 43%, Spline-Net by 30%, and DSE-Net by 23%. Furthermore, our method improved contrast and image quality on real datasets such as water phantom and clinical data. Conclusion: Providing additional information about FOM size improves the robustness of the neural networks for scatter estimation. Our approach is not limited to utilizing only FOM size information; more variables such as tube voltage, scanning geometry, and patient size can be added to improve the robustness of a single network.

Indexed as

auxiliary informationcone-beam computed tomographydeep learningfield-of-measurementscatter estimation

Identifiers

PMID39416361
PMCPMC11477364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.