ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Improvement of the gait deviation index for spinal cord injury to broaden its applicability: the reduced gait deviation index for spinal cord injury (rSCI-GDI).
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and clinical validation of a stroke-specific Gait Deviation Index.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The SCI-GDI is an accurate and effective metric to summarize gait kinematics in adults with SCI. It is usually computed with the information registered with a photogrammetry system because it requires accurate information of pelvic and hip movement in the three anatomic planes, which is hard to record with simpler systems. Additionally, due to being developed from the GDI, the SCI-GDI is built upon nine joint movements selected for a pediatric population with cerebral palsy, for which the GDI was originally developed, but those nine movements are not necessarily as meaningful for adults with SCI. Nevertheless, pelvic movement and hip rotation have been proven to have low reliability even when acquired with gold-standard photogrammetry systems. Additionally, the use of photogrammetry is limited in real-life scenarios and when used with rehabilitation technologies, which limits the use of the SCI-GDI to evaluate gait in alternative scenarios to gait laboratories and to evaluate technologies for gait assistance. This research aimed to improve the SCI-GDI to broaden its applicability beyond the use of photogrammetry. Methods: An exploration of the mathematical relevance of each joint movement included in the original GDI for the performance of the metric is performed. Considering the results obtained and the clinical relevance of each of the 9 joints used to compute the SCI-GDI in the gait pattern of the SCI population, a more adaptable SCI-GDI is proposed using four joint movements that can be precisely captured with simpler systems than photogrammetry: sagittal planes of hip, knee and ankle and hip abduction/adduction. Results: The reduced SCI-GDI (rSCI-GDI) effectively represents gait variability of adults with SCI as does the SCI-GDI, while providing more generalizable results and equivalent or stronger correlations with clinical tests validated in the population. During the derivation of the improved index, it was demonstrated that pelvic movements, hip rotation, and foot progression angle introduce high variability to the dataset of gait patterns of the adult population with SCI, but they have low relevance to characterize gait kinematics of this population. The rSCI-GDI can be calculated using the 14-feature vectorial basis included in the electronic addendum provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.