ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Comparison of Remission Criteria in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from a Smart System of Disease Management Group.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the rates of disease remission evaluated using various remission criteria, including Boolean2.0, Boolean1.0, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and disease activity score using 28 joints based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional observational analysis was performed using data from patients with RA enrolled in a smart system of disease management group (SSDM). The clinical remission rates of RA patients estimated using the DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SDAI, Boolean1.0 and Boolean2.0 criteria were investigated. Variables were compared using the Results: A total of 5619 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of the patients was 56.33 (±13.01) years, with the majority being female (4491, 79.9%). The rates of remission, as assessed by Boolean2.0, Boolean1.0, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI, were 16.6%, 9.7%, 35.2%, 9.1%, and 9.4%, respectively. Comparison with Boolean1.0 criteria revealed higher concordance between Boolean2.0 and DAS28-CRP remission and lower concordance with CDAI and SDAI, regardless of whether the analysis was conducted on the entire population or subgroups based on gender, age or disease duration. Additionally, the administration of different medications may have influenced the rate of Boolean2.0 remission. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a higher concordance between Boolean2.0 criteria and DAS28-CRP remission and a lower concordance with CDAI and SDAI when compared with Boolean1.0 remission criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.