ArticleFrontiers in allergy2024
The prevalence of patients suffering from chronic spontaneous urticaria, in whom omalizumab cannot be stopped even after six years.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Omalizumab (OMA) was the first FDA-approved biological drug for severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), and until today is the only beneficial and truly safe one. The objectives were: To assess the prevalence of CSU patients in whom OMA cannot be stopped over time. We also asked if biomarkers (e.g., anti-TPO antibodies and total IgE) could assist in anticipating this issue. Methods: We used our prospective registry of 93 patients, which included CSU disease duration, the onset of OMA treatment, Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) during follow-up, co-morbidities, serum IgE levels and the presence of anti-TPO antibodies. Finally, we assessed the response to OMA during a period of six years. Results: Out of the 93 treated CSU patients, OMA was stopped in ten patients after six months being defined as failures. In another ten patients, OMA was discontinued after 2-4 years of therapy, achieving a remission. Seventy-three patients are still treated between 2 and 6 years, having different degrees of response. Of these, in thirty-eight (52%) patients, we could not stop OMA even after six years due to CSU relapses. The prevalence of lower serum IgE levels and anti-TPO antibody positivity was significantly higher in CSU patients in whom OMA could not be stopped. Conclusion: This is the first study where OMA-treated CSU patients were followed up to six years. In half of them, long-term therapy of six years is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.