Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416096›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Deep-sea fish reveal alternative pathway for vertebrate visual development.

Lily G Fogg, Stamatina Isari, Jonathan E Barnes, Jagdish Suresh Patel, N Justin Marshall, Walter Salzburger, Fabio Cortesi, Fanny de Busserolles

Abstract readPreprint
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lily G FoggQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5378-8781
Stamatina IsariInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, 5005, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3457-0274
Jonathan E BarnesInstitute for Modeling Collaboration and Innovation, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Jagdish Suresh PatelInstitute for Modeling Collaboration and Innovation, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4999-5347
N Justin MarshallQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-6713
Walter SalzburgerZoological Institute, Department of Environment Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, 4051, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9988-1674
Fabio CortesiQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7518-6159
Fanny de BusserollesQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4602-9840

Funding

Sequence-structure-function relationships in human visual photopigmentsP20GM104420 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI MILLER, CRAIG R · 2015 to 2024
$22.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate vision is accomplished by two phenotypically distinct types of photoreceptors in the retina: the saturation-resistant cones for the detection of bright light and the highly sensitive rods for dim light conditions [1]. The current dogma is that, during development, all vertebrates initially feature a cone-dominated retina, and rods are added later [2, 3]. By studying the ontogeny of vision in three species of deep-sea fishes, we show that their larvae express cone-specific genes in photoreceptors with rod-like morphologies. Through development, these fishes either retain this rod-like cone retina (

Identifiers

PMID39416096
PMCPMC11483065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.