Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416082›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Sequential Effects in Reaching Reveal Efficient Coding in Motor Planning.

Tianhe Wang, Yifan Fang, David Whitney

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianhe WangDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.ORCID 0000-0002-0131-850X
Yifan FangDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
David WhitneyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-5570

Funding

Isolating and mitigating sequentially dependent perceptual errors in clinical visual searchR01CA236793 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI DAVID V WHITNEY · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nervous system utilizes prior information to enhance the accuracy of perception and action. Prevailing models of motor control emphasize Bayesian models, which suggest that the system adjusts the current motor plan by integrating information from previous observations. While Bayesian integration has been extensively examined, those studies usually applied a highly stable and predictable environment. In contrast, in many real-life situations, motor goals change rapidly over time in a relatively unpredictable way, leaving it unclear whether Bayesian integration is useful in those natural environments. An alternative model that leverages prior information to improve performance is efficient coding, which suggests that the motor system maximizes the accuracy by dynamically tuning the allocation of the encoding resources based on environmental statistics. To investigate whether this adaptive mechanism operates in motor planning, we employed center-out reaching tasks with motor goals changing in a relatively unpredictable way, where Bayesian and efficient coding models predict opposite sequential effects. Consistent with the efficient coding model, we found that current movements were biased in the opposite direction of previous movements. These repulsive biases were amplified by intrinsic motor variability. Moreover, movement variability decreased when successive reaches were similar to each other. Together, these effects support the presence of efficient coding in motor planning, a novel mechanism with which the motor system maintains flexibility and high accuracy in dynamic environments.

Indexed as

Bayesian ModelEfficient CodingMotor controlReachingSequential effect

Identifiers

PMID39416082
PMCPMC11483078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.