ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Sequential Effects in Reaching Reveal Efficient Coding in Motor Planning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nervous system utilizes prior information to enhance the accuracy of perception and action. Prevailing models of motor control emphasize Bayesian models, which suggest that the system adjusts the current motor plan by integrating information from previous observations. While Bayesian integration has been extensively examined, those studies usually applied a highly stable and predictable environment. In contrast, in many real-life situations, motor goals change rapidly over time in a relatively unpredictable way, leaving it unclear whether Bayesian integration is useful in those natural environments. An alternative model that leverages prior information to improve performance is efficient coding, which suggests that the motor system maximizes the accuracy by dynamically tuning the allocation of the encoding resources based on environmental statistics. To investigate whether this adaptive mechanism operates in motor planning, we employed center-out reaching tasks with motor goals changing in a relatively unpredictable way, where Bayesian and efficient coding models predict opposite sequential effects. Consistent with the efficient coding model, we found that current movements were biased in the opposite direction of previous movements. These repulsive biases were amplified by intrinsic motor variability. Moreover, movement variability decreased when successive reaches were similar to each other. Together, these effects support the presence of efficient coding in motor planning, a novel mechanism with which the motor system maintains flexibility and high accuracy in dynamic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.