ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
DNA Polymerase Locks Replication Fork Under Stress.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Replication of DNA requires the parental DNA to be unwound to allow the genetic information to be faithfully duplicated by the replisome. While this function is usually shared by a host of proteins in the replisome, notably DNA polymerase (DNAP) and helicase, the consequence of DNAP synthesizing DNA while decoupled from helicase remains not well understood. The unwinding of downstream DNA poses significant stress to DNAP, and the interaction between DNAP and the replication fork may affect replication restart. In this work, we examined the consequences of DNAP working against the stress of the DNA replication fork. We found that prolonged exposure of DNAP to the stress of the replication fork inactivates replication. Surprisingly, replication inactivation was often accompanied by a strong DNAP interaction with the leading and lagging strands at the fork, locking the fork in place. We demonstrated that fork locking is a consequence of DNAP forward translocation, and the exonuclease activity of DNAP, which allows DNAP to move in reverse, is essential in protecting the fork from inactivation. Furthermore, we found the locking configuration is not reversible by the subsequent addition of helicase. Collectively, this study provides a deeper understanding of the DNAP-fork interaction and mechanism in keeping the replication fork active during replication stress.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.