ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Non-invasive brain-machine interface control with artificial intelligence copilots.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) decode neural signals to help people with paralysis move and communicate. Even with important advances in the last two decades, BMIs face key obstacles to clinical viability. Invasive BMIs achieve proficient cursor and robotic arm control but require neurosurgery, posing significant risk to patients. Non-invasive BMIs do not have neurosurgical risk, but achieve lower performance, sometimes being prohibitively frustrating to use and preventing widespread adoption. We take a step toward breaking this performance-risk tradeoff by building performant non-invasive BMIs. The critical limitation that bounds decoder performance in non-invasive BMIs is their poor neural signal-to-noise ratio. To overcome this, we contribute (1) a novel EEG decoding approach and (2) artificial intelligence (AI) copilots that infer task goals and aid action completion. We demonstrate that with this "AI-BMI," in tandem with a new adaptive decoding approach using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and ReFIT-like Kalman filter (KF), healthy users and a paralyzed participant can autonomously and proficiently control computer cursors and robotic arms. Using an AI copilot improves goal acquisition speed by up to 4.3× in the standard center-out 8 cursor control task and enables users to control a robotic arm to perform the sequential pick-and-place task, moving 4 randomly placed blocks to 4 randomly chosen locations. As AI copilots improve, this approach may result in clinically viable non-invasive AI-BMIs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.