ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Reward-driven cerebellar climbing fiber activity influences both neural and behavioral learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cerebellum plays a key role in motor coordination and learning. In contrast with classical supervised learning models, recent work has revealed that CFs can signal reward-predictive information in some behaviors. This raises the question of whether CFs may also operate according to the principles of reinforcement learning. To test how CFs operate during reward-guided behavior, and evaluate the role of reward-related CF activity in learning, we have measured CF responses in Purkinje cells of the lateral cerebellum during a Pavlovian task using 2-photon calcium imaging. Specifically, we have performed multi-stimulus experiments to determine whether CF activity meets the requirements of a reward prediction error (rPE) signal for transfer from an unexpected reward to a reward-predictive cue. We find that once CF activity is transferred to a conditioned stimulus, and there is no longer a response to reward, CFs cannot generate learned responses to a second conditioned stimulus that carries the same reward prediction. In addition, by expressing the inhibitory opsin GtACR2 in neurons of the inferior olive, and optically inhibiting these neurons across behavioral training at the time of unexpected reward, we find that the transfer of CF signals to the conditioned stimulus is impaired. Moreover, this optogenetic inhibition also impairs learning, resulting in a deficit in anticipatory lick timing. Together, these results indicate that CF signals can exhibit several characteristics in common with the rPEs that have been observed during reinforcement learning, and that the cerebellum can harness these reward-related learning signals to generate accurately timed motor behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.