ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
TCRcost: a deep learning model utilizing TCR 3D structure for enhanced of TCR-peptide binding.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- When multimodal fusion fails: contrastive alignment as a necessary stabilizer for TCR-peptide binding prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Modeling TCR-Epitope Recognition Specificity: What We Should Learn to Succeed.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Mapping the TCR landscape: computational tools empowering translational immunology and therapy design.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Computational identification of B- and T-cell epitopes: a unified task taxonomy and review of databases, datasets, predictive pipelines, and gaps.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- SageTCR: a structure-based model integrating residue- and atom-level representations for enhanced TCR-pMHC binding prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Assessing the generalization capabilities of TCR binding predictors via peptide distance analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Predicting TCR-peptide binding is a complex and significant computational problem in systems immunology. During the past decade, a series of computational methods have been developed for better predicting TCR-peptide binding from amino acid sequences. However, the performance of sequence-based methods appears to have hit a bottleneck. Considering the 3D structures of TCR-peptide complexes, which provide much more information, could potentially lead to better prediction outcomes. Methods: In this study, we developed TCRcost, a deep learning method, to predict TCR-peptide binding by incorporating 3D structures. TCRcost overcomes two significant challenges: acquiring a sufficient number of high-quality TCR-peptide structures and effectively extracting information from these structures for binding prediction. TCRcost corrects TCR 3D structures generated by protein structure tools, significantly extending the available datasets. The main and side chains of a TCR structure are separately corrected using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model. This approach prevents interference between the chains and accurately extracts interactions among both adjacent and global atoms. A 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) is designed to extract the atomic features relevant to TCR-peptide binding. The spatial features extracted by the 3DCNN are then processed through a fully connected layer to estimate the probability of TCR-peptide binding. Results: Test results demonstrated that predicting TCR-peptide binding from 3D TCR structures is both efficient and highly accurate with an average accuracy of 0.974 on precise structures. Furthermore, the average accuracy on corrected structures was 0.762, significantly higher than the average accuracy of 0.375 on uncorrected original structures. Additionally, the average root mean square distance (RMSD) to precise structures was significantly reduced from 12.753 Å for predicted structures to 8.785 Å for corrected structures. Discussion: Thus, utilizing structural information of TCR-peptide complexes is a promising approach to improve the accuracy of binding predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.