Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415953›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Harnessing the gut microbiome: a potential biomarker for wild animal welfare.

Sam Sonnega, Michael J Sheriff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Metagenomic Comparison of Gut Microbes ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Comparative assessment of Texas horned lizard (Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sam SonnegaDepartment of Biology, UMass Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, United States.
Michael J SheriffDepartment of Biology, UMass Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The welfare of wild animal populations is critically important to conservation, with profound implications for ecosystem health, biodiversity, and zoonotic disease transmission. Animal welfare is typically defined as the accumulated affective mental state of an animal over a particular time period. However, the assessment of animal welfare in the wild poses unique challenges, primarily due to the lack of universally applicable biomarkers. This perspective explores the potential role of the gut microbiome, a dynamic and non-invasive biomarker, as a novel avenue for evaluating animal welfare in wild animals. The gut microbiome, through interactions with the host's physiology, behavior, and cognition, offers a promising opportunity to gain insights into the well-being of animals. In this synthesis, we discuss the distinction between fitness and welfare, the complexities of assessing welfare in wild populations, and the linkages between the gut microbiome and aspects of animal welfare such as behavior and cognition. We lastly elucidate how the gut microbiome could serve as a valuable tool for wildlife managers, with the potential to serve as a non-invasive yet informative window into the welfare of wild animals. As this nascent field evolves, it presents unique opportunities to enhance our understanding of the well-being of wild animals and to contribute to the preservation of ecosystems, biodiversity, and human health.

Indexed as

ecology and behaviorgut microbiomestresswelfarewildlife

Identifiers

PMID39415953
PMCPMC11479891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.