ArticleJAMIA open2024
Designing and testing clinical simulations of an early warning system for implementation in acute care settings.
Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in educational theory and translational implementation of simulation-based education for healthcare professionals: an integrative analysis from theory to effectiveness.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating Equity in Usage and Effectiveness of the CONCERN Early Warning System.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Implementation of Passive Deterioration Index Alerts in an Intermediate Care Unit: A Failed Early Warning System Strategy.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Conducting simulation testing with end-users is essential for facilitating successful implementation of new health information technologies. This study designed a standardized simulation testing process with a system prototype prior to implementation to help study teams identify the system's interpretability and feasibility from the end-user perspective and to effectively integrate new innovations into real-world clinical settings and workflows. Materials and Methods: A clinical simulation model was developed to test a new Clinical Decision Support (CDS) system outside of the clinical environment while maintaining high fidelity. A web-based CDS prototype, the "CONCERN Smart Application," which leverages clinical data to measure and express a patient's risk of deterioration on a 3-level scale ("low," "moderate," or "high"), and audiovisual-integrated materials, were used to lead simulation sessions. Results: A total of 6 simulation sessions with 17 nurses were held to investigate how nurses interact with the CONCERN Smart application and how it influences their critical thinking, and clinical responses. Four themes were extracted from the simulation debriefing sessions and used to inform implementation strategies. The strategies include how the CDS should be improved for practical real-world use. Discussion and Conclusions: Standardized simulation testing procedures identified and informed the necessary CDS improvements, the enhancements needed for real-world use, and the training requirements to effectively prepare end-users for system go-live.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.