ArticleRSC pharmaceutics2024
Comparison of emulsion and spray methods for fabrication of rapamycin-loaded acetalated dextran microparticles.
Article in RSC pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoantigen-loaded Polymeric Microparticles associate with B cells and promote tolerogenic antigen presentation in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Controlled Release of Poly(U) via Acetalated Dextran Microparticles for Enhanced Vaccine Adjuvant Delivery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Induction of Antigen-Specific Tolerance in a Multiple Sclerosis Model without Broad Immunosuppression.ACS nano · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapamycin (rapa), an immunosuppressive medication, has demonstrated considerable effectiveness in reducing organ transplant rejection and treating select autoimmune diseases. However, the standard oral administration of rapa results in poor bioavailability, broad biodistribution, and harmful off-target effects, necessitating improved drug delivery formulations. Polymeric microparticles (MPs) are one such solution and have demonstrated promise in pre-clinical studies to improve the therapeutic efficacy of rapa. Nevertheless, MP formulations are highly diverse, and fabrication method selection is a critical consideration in formulation design. Herein, we compared common fabrication processes for the development of rapa-loaded MPs. Using the biopolymer acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX), rapa-loaded MPs were fabricated by both emulsion (homogenization and sonication) and spray (electrospray and spray drying) methods, and resultant MPs were characterized for size, morphology, surface charge, and drug release kinetics. MPs were then screened in LPS-stimulated macrophages to gauge immunosuppressive efficacy relative to soluble drug. We determined that homogenized MPs possessed the most optimal combination of sizing, tunable drug release kinetics, and immunosuppressive efficacy, and we subsequently demonstrated that these characteristics were maintained across a range of potential rapa loadings. Further, we performed
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.