Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415892›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

On dementia, duties, and daughters. An ethical analysis of healthcare professionals being confronted with conflicts regarding filial duties in informal dementia care.

Vildan Dogan, Marija Taneska, Gabriela Novotni, Svetlana Iloski, Antoni Novotni, Vesna Dimitrova, Miloš Milutinović, Ljubisha Novotni, Anne Weber, Boban Joksimoski and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vildan Dogan *Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Cognitive Disorders, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marija Taneska *Institute for Alzheimer's Disease and Neuroscience, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Gabriela NovotniInstitute for Alzheimer's Disease and Neuroscience, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Svetlana IloskiInstitute for Alzheimer's Disease and Neuroscience, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Antoni NovotniInstitute for Alzheimer's Disease and Neuroscience, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Vesna DimitrovaFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Miloš MilutinovićFaculty of Medicine, University Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Ljubisha NovotniFaculty of Medicine, University Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Anne WeberHannover Institute for Philosophical Research, Hannover, Germany.
Boban JoksimoskiFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Ivan ChorbevFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Shpresa HasaniInstitute for Alzheimer's Disease and Neuroscience, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Andrea IvanovskaInstitute for Alzheimer's Disease and Neuroscience, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Timo GrimmerClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Cognitive Disorders, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julia FischerClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Cognitive Disorders, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Existing literature on moral conflicts that healthcare professionals encounter in dementia care has explored, amongst others, issues related to autonomy, decision-making capacity, privacy, and more. Notably, conflicts related to healthcare professionals who support informal dementia caregiving and who are confronted with family members being overburdened with their care responsibly remains an underexplored topic in the current literature, particularly in the context of Low-and Middle-Income Countries. The present paper introduces such an encounter, presenting an ethical case analysis of a conflict that occurred during a larger research project conducted in North Macedonia. Case to be studied: Due to the absence of formal care services that could have relieved an overburdened family caregiver, healthcare professionals felt compelled to reach out to the uninvolved adult daughters, requesting them to participate in their parents' care. Wondering about whether their reaching out to the daughters might count as an attempt of pressure and undue interference, professionals conflicted over the appropriateness of their action. This paper follows up on their concern, ethically assessing the professionals' action. To answer the question on whether the healthcare professionals acted appropriately or not, and to what extent, theories of filial duties are applied, embedding their action in the larger context of dementia care in North Macedonia. Results and conclusion: It is argued that the lack of formal care services in North Macedonia is of utmost relevance to the conflict. Thus, the conclusion is that the ethical inappropriateness of the case is to be located not so much with the action of the healthcare professionals but with the state because of its failure to provide professional care services that allow healthcare professionals to take ethically sound actions to counteract overarching burdens that family members face when providing informal dementia care.

Indexed as

caring democracydementiaethical conflictfilial dutieshealthcare professionalsinformal caregivingNorth Macedonia

Identifiers

PMID39415892
PMCPMC11480755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.