ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Development of an evaluation system for rational drug use in patients with chronic kidney disease using the Delphi method.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Mechanism and Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine Nano-Formulations in the Treatment of Renal Fibrosis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Development and applicability assessment of a 5R-principle-guided evaluation system for antimicrobial stewardship in open extremity trauma using a hybrid Delphi-analytic hierarchy process model.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-4 present a significant clinical challenge due to the absence of a systematic approach to managing associated medication-related problems (MRPs). This lack of a structured framework hinders the timely identification and effective intervention for these complications, potentially compromising patient safety and prognosis. Objective: This study aims to leverage the Delphi method to establish an evaluation index for a rational drug use evaluation system dedicated to CKD patients in stages 3-4. This system will function as a platform for the continuous identification and management of MRPs, ultimately contributing to improved medication safety and patient outcomes. Methods: This research uses the modified Delphi technique to develop an evaluation system for rational drug use in patients with chronic kidney disease. The initial questionnaire was developed by literature review for patients with chronic kidney disease. Twenty-six senior experts formed a panel in order to evaluate items across two Delphi rounds. Consensus was defined as at least 95% agreement (first round) and 85% agreement (second round), agreeing with an average score of at least 4.5 (first round) and 4.0 (second round). Items that fulfill the stipulated criteria are eligible for inclusion in the consensus list. Results: All experts participated in both rounds (100% response rate). Consensus was achieved on three patient-related items in the first round of 34 items. Based on expert feedback, 18 revised items were included in the second round after refining, restructuring, and removing some elements. Following two rounds of consultation, 20 items achieved consensus, encompassing aspects such as drug selection, dosage assessment, treatment duration, prescription and dispensing practices, patient-related factors, and other relevant considerations. Conclusion: This study has successfully identified 20 key evaluation indicators for a rational drug use evaluation system specifically designed for CKD patients in stages 3 and 4. This system will serve as a tool for continuous MRP identification and timely intervention, ultimately enhancing medication safety and patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.