ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024
Finite element analysis confirms the optimal apex position in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy to avoid lateral hinge fracture.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Finite element analysis confirms the optimal apex position in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy to avoid lateral hinge fracture.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Lateral hinge fracture is a significant complication of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. While fracture risk is closely associated with the osteotomy apex position, the optimum position remains variable within the literature. Our hypothesis is that stresses at the osteotomy apex predicted by finite element analysis can be used to identify an apex position which minimises intra and postoperative fracture risks. Methods: A finite element model was studied to investigate the effect of varying the hinge position on fracture risk and severity for a given bone geometry; variables analysed included stress, strain and micromotion levels. Nine further knee models were studied to assess the variability between patients' bone properties and examine the effect of apex location on strains. Results: Lateral hinge width and height significantly influence intra-operative stress, strain, and fracture risk, while hinge width predominately determines postoperative stability. Wider hinges improve postoperative stability, but increase the likelihood of intra-articular fractures. Aiming the apex at the fibular head height minimises strain. The osteotomy apex should be located such that the hinge width is equal to 13% of the medial-lateral width to minimise apex stress and fracture risk while preserving sufficient bone at the hinge for stability. The height of the apex from the tibial plateau should maintain a minimum value of 16% of the medial-lateral width to avoid intra-articular fracture, with the apex below the fibula head if necessary. The size of the tibia does not alter the optimal location, making our findings applicable across all tibia sizes. Conclusions: Our study has investigated and verified a proposed optimal apex position, based upon fracture risk prediction and micromotion at the osteotomy apex. This is clinically useful due to the potential use of the apex point on preoperative 2D radiographs when planning surgery. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.