Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415557›Full record

ReviewAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2025

Örjan Ouchterlony and the antigen-antibody double diffusion-in-gel: a survey.

Niels Høiby

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Niels HøibyDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-725X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Swedish scientist Örjan Ouchterlony published four ground-breaking papers 1948-1966 in Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand where he described a new method of antigen-antibody reactions in gel. He described and defined the 'reaction of identity' and 'reaction of partial identity' when he used related antigens and 'reaction of non-identity' when he used non-related antigens. His results inspired scientists in other countries to further develop and modify the 'Ouchterlony method' which became useful for both scientific and clinical purposes. This survey describes how the methods were discovered and how they became modified and improved and how they were used, but also underlines that the original Ouchterlony method is still used.

Indexed as

Antigen-Antibody ReactionsHistory, 20th CenturyHumansImmunodiffusionSwedenDiffusion‐in‐gelimmunoelectrophoresisOuchterlony

Identifiers

PMID39415557
PMCPMC11669740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.