Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415317›Full record

ReviewGlia2025

Molecular profiling of invertebrate glia.

Maria D Purice, Inês Lago-Baldaia, Vilaiwan M Fernandes, Aakanksha Singhvi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Glia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria D PuriceDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2756-7763
Inês Lago-BaldaiaDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Vilaiwan M FernandesDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.
Aakanksha SinghviDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-8536

Funding

Interdisciplinary Tranining in Cancer ResearchT32CA080416 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STODDARD, BARRY L. · 1998 to 2023
$9.7M
Molecular dissection of glia-neuron interactionsR01NS114222 · NINDS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SINGHVI, AAKANKSHA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Brain Research Foundation BRFSG-2023-10Esther A. and Joseph Klingenstein Fund 227823NCI NIH HHS T32 CA080416NIH HHS 5T32CA080416-25NIH HHS NS114222NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114222Washington Research FoundationWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 225986/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster are powerful experimental models for uncovering fundamental tenets of nervous system organization and function. Findings over the last two decades show that molecular and cellular features are broadly conserved between invertebrates and vertebrates, indicating that insights derived from invertebrate models can broadly inform our understanding of glial operating principles across diverse species. In recent years, these model systems have led to exciting discoveries in glial biology and mechanisms of glia-neuron interactions. Here, we summarize studies that have applied current state-of-the-art "-omics" techniques to C. elegans and D. melanogaster glia. Coupled with the remarkable acceleration in the pace of mechanistic studies of glia biology in recent years, these indicate that invertebrate glia also exhibit striking molecular complexity, specificity, and heterogeneity. We provide an overview of these studies and discuss their implications as well as emerging questions where C. elegans and D. melanogaster are well-poised to fill critical knowledge gaps in our understanding of glial biology.

Indexed as

NeurogliaAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogaster

Identifiers

PMID39415317
PMCPMC11784859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.