Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415305›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2024

EzySCR: A free and easy tool for scoring event-related skin conductance responses in the first, second, and third interval latency windows.

Luke J Ney, Jorge L Pardo, Ottmar V Lipp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luke J NeySchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0209-8366
Jorge L PardoSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ottmar V LippSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-8608

Funding

Australian Research Council DP180100869National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1156490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin conductance is a commonly used physiological measure during psychology experiments, such as during fear conditioning. Methods for scoring skin conductance responses (SCRs) are highly heterogeneous, though most researchers agree that manually inspected scores provide the highest quality data when compared to most available fully automated scoring methods. However, manual scoring is extremely time-consuming. We developed a semi-automated scoring program that reduces the time required to process SCR data at a level of quality akin to manual scoring. In contrast to all previous scoring programs, our program enables scoring of first interval response (FIR), second interval response (SIR), and third interval response (TIR) SCRs. Using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland-Altman plots and Pareto analysis, we show here that our method is highly reliable and produces data that are almost identical to data that are manually scored and scored using LEDALAB. This software is very easy to use and is freely available to download and modify. We expect that this software will be helpful in reducing the time required to produce high quality FIR, SIR, and TIR skin conductance data for psychology researchers around the world.

Indexed as

Galvanic Skin ResponseAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSoftwareYoung Adultelectrodermal activityfear conditioningskin conductance responding

Identifiers

PMID39415305
PMCPMC11579223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.