Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415264›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Brain-to-brain synchrony increased during interpersonal touch in romantic lovers: an EEG-based hyperscanning study.

Chenghao Zhou, Xiaowei Jiang, Yanan Chen, Chunlei Ge, Na Ao, Feng Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenghao ZhouInstitute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475001, China.
Xiaowei JiangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6321, USA.
Yanan ChenInstitute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475001, China. chenyn@henu.edu.cn.
Chunlei GeInstitute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475001, China.
Na AoInstitute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475001, China.
Feng DuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

Funding

Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences No. GJ202007the Education and teaching reform project of Psychology Education commission, Ministry of Education 20222005the Humanities and Social Sciences project of Ministry of Education 22YJCZH021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterpersonal touch is an essential element of human social life. It's unclear whether the neural patterns of interpersonal touch are specific to intimate relationships or generally apply to other social relationships. Romantic lovers are typically intimate and have a high level of interpersonal touch. Currently, researchers focused on the neurobiological basis and neural processes of romantic love.

methods110 participants finished two resting-state blocks, no-handholding and handholding conditions, with Electroencephalogram (EEG). We aimed to explore the differences in the brain-brain synchrony pattern of interpersonal touch between romantic lovers and strangers by calculating dynamic interpersonal functional connectivity (dIFC) via EEG-based hyperscanning.

resultsOur results supported that the neural processing of interpersonal touch is a dynamic process. At first half, both groups tended to adapt, and then interpersonal touch increased the dIFC between romantic lovers and decreased the dIFC between strangers. Finally, we employed Support Vector Machine (SVM) to classify EEG signals into two different relationships. SVM recognized two relationships with an accuracy of 71% and 0.77 AUC of ROC at the first half, a 73% accuracy and 0.8 AUC of ROC at the second half.

conclusionsOur study indicates that interpersonal touch may have different meanings between romantic lovers and strangers. Specifically, interpersonal touch enhances the dIFC between romantic lovers while reducing the dIFC between strangers. The research has important implications for planning touch-based interventions in social and medical care.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyInterpersonal RelationsLoveTouchAdultFemaleHumansMaleSupport Vector MachineTouch PerceptionYoung AdultBrain-to-brain synchronyDynamic interpersonal functional connectivityEEG-based hyperscanningInterpersonal touchRomantic love

Identifiers

PMID39415264
PMCPMC11481425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.