ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2024
Age-specific 3-year risk of cervical precancer among HPV-positive women attending screening: a post hoc analysis from a retrospective cohort.
Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cervical cancer screening policy inequality worldwide: a systematic review of disparities in access and implementation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term human papillomavirus genotype-specific risk of cervical high-grade intraepithelial lesion and cancer-By age group and triage cytology.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This post hoc analysis explored the age-specific risk of cervical precancer in women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV), using data from a cohort of 7263 participants aged 21-71years undergoing cervical screening. We found a slightly varied prevalence of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) in different age, with highest in women under 30 years old (9.28% for 13 hrHPVs tested by HC2-HPV, 10.82% for 14 hrHPVs tested by DH3-HPV). However, the prevalence of cytology abnormalities peaked in age 30-39 years (~ 3.6%). A total of 5840 women completed 3-year follow-up. Among them, 558 were positive for HC2 assay and 583 were positive for DH3-HPV at baseline. Of note, the 3-year cumulative risks for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) or grade 3+ (CIN3+) in women infected with high-risk HPV did not increase with age but declined (e.g., 41.67%, 27.78%, 26.42%, 15.98%, and 18% for CIN2 + risk in HC2-positive women at year 25-29, year 30-39, year 40-49, year 50-59, and year 60-71, respectively). If stratified by the median age, younger women (25-48 years) positive with HC2-HPV at baseline had a higher 3-year CIN2+/CIN3 + risk than older women (49-71 years) [26.55% (95%CI = 21.8-31.92%) vs. 18.28% (95%CI = 14.11-23.34%), P = 0.019; 15.52% (95%CI = 11.81-20.14%) vs. 9.7% (95%CI = 6.71-13.83%), P = 0.039]. Similarly, for women positive with DH3-HPV at baseline, younger group had a higher 3-year CIN2+/CIN3 + risk than older group [26.44% (95%CI = 21.73-31.75%) vs. 17.01% (95%CI = 13.11-21.78%), P = 0.006; 15.25% (95%CI = 11.6-19.8%) vs. 9.03% (95%CI = 6.24-12.9%), P = 0.021]. These findings indicate the potential value of age-specific risk assessment in cervical cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.