Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415190›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

In vitro determination of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity induced by stainless steel brackets with and without surface coating in cultures of oral mucosal cells.

Dhruv Ahuja, Nidhin Philip Jose, Rozy Kamal, Vinaya Panduranga, Supriya Nambiar, Arun M Isloor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dhruv AhujaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies(MRIIRS), Faridabad, Haryana, 121004, India.
Nidhin Philip JoseDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. nidhin.philip@manipal.edu.
Rozy KamalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Vinaya PandurangaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Supriya NambiarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Arun M IsloorDepartment of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthodontics is a speciality of dentistry that uses a plethora of devices made from myriad materials to manage various malocclusions. Prolonged contact of orthodontic appliances with oral tissues can lead to cellular damage, highlighting the need for biocompatible materials to mitigate health risks.

objectivesTo analyze the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity produced by metal brackets and coated metallic brackets with polymeric and nanoparticle coatings in oral mucosal cells. MATERIALS &

methodsThe current study compares the toxicity of 3 different types of orthodontic brackets with control groups of oral mucosal cells. Each of the three treatment groups consisted of 10 samples of orthodontic brackets: stainless steel brackets(Group 1), nanoparticle-coated brackets(Group 2), and polymeric-coated brackets(Group 3) exposed to corrosion eluates employing an oral biomimicry model. Two types of oral mucosal cells- Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Buccal Epithelial Cells were used to study the cytotoxic and/or genotoxic effects of the elutes. Intergroup comparisons were conducted using one-way analysis of variance, while scanning electron microscopy evaluated surface characteristic.

resultsThe interaction between metal ions and oral mucosal cells showed no statistically significant difference for toxicity assays between the three groups(p > 0.005). However, polymeric and nanoparticle-coated groups showed reduced cellular differentiation when compared with conventional stainless-steel brackets.

conclusionThis in-vitro study shows that polymeric or nanoparticle coating of conventional metal brackets aids in enhancing corrosion-resistant characteristics of orthodontic appliances and reduces the toxic oral environment created by metal release in the oral cavity.

Indexed as

Mouth MucosaOrthodontic BracketsStainless SteelCells, CulturedCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCorrosionDental AlloysFibroblastsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNanoparticlesSurface PropertiesCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDental AlloysStainless SteelBiocompatibilityCorrosionCytotoxicityGenotoxicityOral mucosal cellOrthodontic brackets

Identifiers

PMID39415190
PMCPMC11484226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.