Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415189›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2024

Distinct methylome profile of cfDNA in AMI patients reveals significant alteration in cAMP signaling pathway genes regulating cardiac muscle contraction.

Manoswini Dash, Bhawna Mahajan, Shobhita Shah, Ghulam Mehdi Dar, Parameswar Sahu, Abhay Kumar Sharma, Nimisha, Sundeep Singh Saluja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Circulating-free DNA: A promising tool for early detection of myocardial infarction.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manoswini DashCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Bhawna MahajanCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India. drbhavna.gbph@nic.in.
Shobhita ShahCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Ghulam Mehdi DarCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Parameswar SahuCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Abhay Kumar SharmaCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
NimishaCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.
Sundeep Singh SalujaCentral Molecular Laboratory, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/INF/22/SP33063/2019Indian Council of Medical Research ISRM/12(44)/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of epigenetics in cardiovascular diseases has paved the way for innovative therapeutic approaches. Investigating epigenetic changes using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) holds substantial promise beyond mere diagnostics, especially for heart-related conditions like acute myocardial infarction (AMI), where obtaining tissue samples is a challenge. This study explores the methylation patterns of cfDNA in AMI patients and compares them with genomic DNA (gDNA) from the same individuals, aiming to evaluate the effectiveness of cfDNA as a valuable resource for studying heart-related diseases. METHODOLOGY: We generated global methylome profiles of cfDNA and gDNA from 25 AMI patients using EM-Seq. Tissue deconvolution analysis was performed to estimate tissue specificity based on the methylation patterns. Differentially methylated loci were identified and explored to understand AMI pathophysiology.

resultsComparative analysis of cfDNA and gDNA methylation patterns in AMI patients reveals cfDNA holds more significance than gDNA. Principal component analysis revealed distinct clusters for cfDNA and gDNA, indicating distinct methylome profiles. cfDNA originated from multiple sources, predominantly from neutrophils (~ 75%) and about 10% from the left atrium, highlighting cardiac-specific changes. In contrast, immune cells are the major source of gDNA, indicative of inflammatory responses. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) associates cfDNA methylation patterns with pathways related to cardiac muscle contraction, inflammation, hypoxia, and lipid metabolism. The affected genes include G protein-coupled receptors (GHSR, FFAR2, HTR1A, and VIPR2) that are part of the cAMP signaling pathway.

conclusionEpigenetic changes in cfDNA are more specific to cardiac tissue compared to those in gDNA, providing better insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in AMI. Genes that are differentially methylated in cfDNA and regulate core pathways, such as cAMP signaling, could be targeted for clinical applications, including the development of effective biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsCyclic AMPDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomeMyocardial InfarctionSignal TransductionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial ContractionCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCyclic AMPAcute myocardial infarctionCell-free DNAEM-seqEpigeneticsMethylome sequencingTissue specificity

Identifiers

PMID39415189
PMCPMC11484321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.