ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2024
Impact of letrozole co-treatment in an antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI: a retrospective study.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Utility of GnRH Agonists before embryo transfer in women with adenomyosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe present study aimed to investigate the impact of combined use of letrozole in an antagonist protocol during IVF on live birth outcomes and to assess the safety of letrozole in terms of maternal and neonatal complications.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included women undergoing IVF/ICSI and fresh embryo transfer (ET) treatment with and without letrozole co-treatment from 2007 to 2021 at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China). The primary outcome was the live birth rate, while the incidences of maternal and neonatal complications were secondary outcomes. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the analyzed outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was performed using a propensity score-based patient-matching (PSM) model, an inverse probability weighting (IPW) model, logistic regression models with women undergoing their first IVF-ET cycle, and subgroup analysis.
resultsOf the 4780 women enrolled in the study, 3887 underwent an antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, while 893 received letrozole co-treatment. In this cohort, letrozole co-treatment demonstrated comparable live birth rates to the use of antagonist protocol alone (logistic regression: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; PSM: aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.22; IPW: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.10). Notably, individuals with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 24 and those with high ovarian response experienced higher live birth rates under the letrozole co-treatment regimen (BMI ≥ 24: aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.14-3.00; high response: aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.02-2.50). Letrozole co-treatment was also associated with decreased risks of gestational diabetes (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.69) and small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.75) in fresh ET cycles. These finding were robust in both PSM and IPW models.
conclusionsOur findings suggested that letrozole co-treatment in antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI was associated with a comparable live birth rate following fresh ET. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to verify our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.