Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415093›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Engaging primary care patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: user insights to inform implementation strategy design.

Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Matteo Pieri, Samantha E Weiss, Joseph Harrison, Gabriela Kattan Khazanov, Molly Candon, David W Oslin, Matthew J Press, Eleanor Anderson, Emilie Famiglio and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05021224 (Leveraging Behavioral Economics and Implementation Science to Engage Suicidal Patients in Mental Health Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05021224 nacompletednot on this map

Leveraging Behavioral Economics and Implementation Science to Engage Suicidal Patients in Mental Health Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsSuicide, Depression, Mental Health Impairment, Suicidal IdeationArmsCaring Contacts, Reminders, Informational Poster, Motivational Interviewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Courtney Benjamin WolkDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA. courtney.wolk@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Matteo PieriDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Samantha E WeissDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joseph HarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gabriela Kattan KhazanovDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Molly CandonDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David W OslinDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew J PressLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eleanor AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Emilie FamiglioDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alison ButtenheimLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shari Jager-HymanDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Leveraging behavioral economics and implementation science to engage suicidal patients in mental health treatmentR21MH123851 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JAGER-HYMAN, SHARI, WOLK, COURTNEY LYNN BENJAMIN · 2021 to 2022
$447k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH123851NIMH NIH HHS R21MH123851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that the majority of suicide decedents visit primary care in the year preceding death, primary care has been identified as a key setting in which to engage patients at risk for suicide in mental health services. The objective of this research was to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement in mental health services among primary care patients at risk for suicide to inform the development of strategies to increase engagement.

methodsSeventy-four semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with primary care patients (n = 20), primary care (n = 18) and behavioral health (n = 12) clinicians, mental health intake coordinators (n = 4), and health system and clinic leaders (n = 20). Patients who had been referred for mental health services from primary care and reported an elevated score (≥ 1) on item 9 on the Patient Health Questionnaire at the time of referral were eligible to participate. Eligible clinicians and leaders were employed in a primary care or behavioral health setting in a single large health system with an integrated mental health program. Interviews typically lasted 30-60 min, were completed over video conference or phone, and were coded by members of the research team using a rapid qualitative analysis procedure.

resultsParticipants were primarily female (64.9%), white (70.3%) and non-Hispanic/Latine (91.9%). The most identified barriers to mental health care engagement were waitlists, capacity limits, insurance, patient characteristics, communication, collaboration, and/or difficulties surrounding travel. The most commonly cited facilitators of engagement included telehealth, integrated care models, reminders, case management support, psychoeducation, motivational enhancement, and scheduling flexibility. Concrete suggestions for improving engagement in mental health services included increasing communication between providers, streamlining referral and intake processes, providing reminders and follow ups, and advocacy for increased reimbursement for suicide risk assessment.

conclusionsResults underscore the myriad barriers patients at risk for suicide encounter when attempting to engage in mental health care in a primary care setting. Facilitators of engagement and suggestions for improving connections to care were also identified, which can inform the design of implementation strategies to improve engagement in mental health services among primary care patients at risk for suicide.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05021224 (Registered August 19, 2021).

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareSuicide PreventionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSuicideBehavior changeImplementationSuicideTreatment engagementTreatment initiation

Identifiers

PMID39415093
PMCPMC11481249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.