Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39415082›Full record

ReviewBMC nephrology2024

Artificial intelligence and predictive models for early detection of acute kidney injury: transforming clinical practice.

Tu T Tran, Giae Yun, Sejoong Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Dynamic Online Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  8. Calibration and prediction of results after failed injection in SPECT renal dynamic imaging.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tu T Tran *Department of Internal Medicine, Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.
Giae Yun *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sejoong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sejoong2@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

NIH HHSNIH HHS RS-2024-00331844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) presents a significant clinical challenge due to its rapid progression to kidney failure, resulting in serious complications such as electrolyte imbalances, fluid overload, and the potential need for renal replacement therapy. Early detection and prediction of AKI can improve patient outcomes through timely interventions. This review was conducted as a narrative literature review, aiming to explore state-of-the-art models for early detection and prediction of AKI. We conducted a comprehensive review of findings from various studies, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and practical considerations for implementation in healthcare settings. We highlight the potential benefits and challenges of their integration into routine clinical care and emphasize the importance of establishing robust early-detection systems before the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted prediction models. Advances in AI for AKI detection and prediction are examined, addressing their clinical applicability, challenges, and opportunities for routine implementation.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryArtificial IntelligenceEarly DiagnosisHumansAcute kidney injuryArtificial intelligenceEarly detectionMachine learningPrediction models

Identifiers

PMID39415082
PMCPMC11484428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.