ArticleScientific reports2024
Radiomics approach for identifying radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in the lung.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting homologous recombination deficiency and treatment responses using a computed tomography-based foundation model: a preclinical study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Incremental predictive value of a CT-based deep learning radiomics model for differentiating benign and malignant pleural effusions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven imaging data for early prediction of lung toxicity in breast cancer radiotherapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of upper airway CT-based radiomics in adult obstructive sleep apnea.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapidly evolving field of radiomics has shown that radiomic features are able to capture characteristics of both tumor and normal tissue that can be used to make accurate and clinically relevant predictions. In the present study we sought to determine if radiomic features can characterize the adverse effects caused by normal tissue injury as well as identify if human embryonic stem cell (hESC) derived extracellular vesicle (EV) treatment can resolve certain adverse complications. A cohort of 72 mice (n = 12 per treatment group) were exposed to X-ray radiation to the whole lung (3 × 8 Gy) or to the apex of the right lung (3 × 12 Gy), immediately followed by retro-orbital injection of EVs. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography images were acquired before and 2 weeks after treatment. In total, 851 radiomic features were extracted from the whole lungs and < 20 features were selected to train and validate a series of random forest classification models trained to predict radiation status, EV status and treatment group. It was found that all three classification models achieved significantly high prediction accuracies on a validation subset of the dataset (AUCs of 0.91, 0.86 and 0.80 respectively). In the locally irradiated lung, a significant difference between irradiated and unirradiated groups as well as an EV sparing effect were observed in several radiomic features that were not seen in the unirradiated lung (including wavelet-LLH Kurtosis, wavelet HLL Large Area High Gray Level Emphasis, and Gray Level Non-Uniformity). Additionally, a radiation difference was not observed in a secondary comparison cohort, but there was no impact of imaging machine parameters on the radiomic signature of unirradiated mice. Our data demonstrate that radiomics has the potential to identify radiation-induced lung injury and could be applied to predict therapeutic efficacy at early timepoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.