Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39414980›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Knowledge abstraction and filtering based federated learning over heterogeneous data views in healthcare.

Anshul Thakur, Soheila Molaei, Pafue Christy Nganjimi, Fenglin Liu, Andrew Soltan, Patrick Schwab, Kim Branson, David A Clifton

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anshul ThakurDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. anshul.thakur@eng.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7006-1947
Soheila MolaeiDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Pafue Christy NganjimiDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fenglin LiuDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrew SoltanDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-5361
Patrick SchwabGlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
Kim BransonGlaxoSmithKline, London, UK.
David A CliftonDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9848-8555

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust data privacy regulations hinder the exchange of healthcare data among institutions, crucial for global insights and developing generalised clinical models. Federated learning (FL) is ideal for training global models using datasets from different institutions without compromising privacy. However, disparities in electronic healthcare records (EHRs) lead to inconsistencies in ML-ready data views, making FL challenging without extensive preprocessing and information loss. These differences arise from variations in services, care standards, and record-keeping practices. This paper addresses data view heterogeneity by introducing a knowledge abstraction and filtering-based FL framework that allows FL over heterogeneous data views without manual alignment or information loss. The knowledge abstraction and filtering mechanism maps raw input representations to a unified, semantically rich shared space for effective global model training. Experiments on three healthcare datasets demonstrate the framework's effectiveness in overcoming data view heterogeneity and facilitating information sharing in a federated setup.

Identifiers

PMID39414980
PMCPMC11484763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.