ArticleNature communications2024
Macrolide resistance through uL4 and uL22 ribosomal mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinctive Lacritin Cleavage-Potentiated Bactericidal Alteration of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The application of the CRISPR-Cas system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Immune protection and persistence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections by pyruvate cross-feeding.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Carbapenem-resistance oprD mutations reshape Pseudomonas aeruginosa host-pathogen interactions during infection.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Translation quality control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: current knowledge and perspectives.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Revisiting Whooping Cough: Global Drivers and Implications of Pertussis Resurgence in the Acellular Vaccine Era.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Preserving the efficacy of antibiotics to tackle antibiotic resistance.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macrolides are widely used antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial airway infections. Due to its elevated minimum inhibitory concentration in standardized culture media, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered intrinsically resistant and, therefore, antibiotic susceptibility testing against macrolides is not performed. Nevertheless, due to macrolides' immunomodulatory effect and suppression of virulence factors, they are used for the treatment of persistent P. aeruginosa infections. Here, we demonstrate that macrolides are, instead, effective antibiotics against P. aeruginosa airway infections in an Air-Liquid Interface (ALI) infection model system resembling the human airways. Importantly, macrolide treatment in both people with cystic fibrosis and primary ciliary dyskinesia patients leads to the accumulation of uL4 and uL22 ribosomal protein mutations in P. aeruginosa which causes antibiotic resistance. Consequently, higher concentrations of antibiotics are needed to modulate the macrolide-dependent suppression of virulence. Surprisingly, even in the absence of antibiotics, these mutations also lead to a collateral reduction in growth rate, virulence and pathogenicity in airway ALI infections which are pivotal for the establishment of a persistent infection. Altogether, these results lend further support to the consideration of macrolides as de facto antibiotics against P. aeruginosa and the need for resistance monitoring upon prolonged macrolide treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.