Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39414828›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Skull morphology analysis suggests the extinct Cape lion, Panthera leo melanochaita (Smith, 1842), is not distinctive.

Olga Nanova, David M Cooper, Andrew C Kitchener, Graham I H Kerley, Thomas P Gnoske, Julian C Kerbis Peterhans, Velizar Simeonovski, Bruce D Patterson, David W Macdonald, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olga NanovaDivision of Mammals, Zoological Museum, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Ul. Bol'shaya Nikitskaya 6, 125009, Moscow, Russian Federation.
David M CooperDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, EH1 1JF, UK.
Andrew C KitchenerDepartment of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, EH1 1JF, UK.
Graham I H KerleyCentre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Gqeberha, 6031, South Africa.
Thomas P GnoskeNegaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S. DuSable Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605-2827, USA.
Julian C Kerbis PeterhansNegaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S. DuSable Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605-2827, USA.
Velizar SimeonovskiNegaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S. DuSable Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605-2827, USA.
Bruce D PattersonNegaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 S. DuSable Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605-2827, USA.
David W MacdonaldWildCRU, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon, OX13 5QL, UK.
Nobuyuki YamaguchiWildCRU, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon, OX13 5QL, UK. nobuyuki.yamaguchi@umt.edu.my.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-24-00013SYNTHESYS (Synthesis of Systematic Resources) BE-TAF-1083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lion (Panthera leo) was extirpated from the Cape region of South Africa during the mid-nineteenth century. Whilst historically classified as a distinct subspecies known as the Cape lion (P. l. melanochaita), recent molecular studies challenge the distinctiveness of this population, suggesting that it represents the southernmost population of the species' Southern Clade. The Cape lion is often cited as having a distinctive skull morphology, which has justified its subspecific classification, but only a limited number of specimens have been available for examination, so that the Cape lion's skull morphology has not been satisfactorily understood. In this study we collected morphometric data from a greatly enlarged sample of 22 Cape lion skulls, including 12 adults, constituting the largest sample size analysed for this possible subspecies. The results suggest that (1) morphological characteristics of the skull previously thought to distinguish the Cape lion are not diagnostic, and (2) nor is the skull morphology of male and female Cape lions distinct from that of males and females of other southern African lions. Our results independently support those based on molecular investigations, which suggest that the Cape lion was not distinct from other lions within the Southern Clade.

Indexed as

LionsSkullAnimalsExtinction, BiologicalFemaleMaleSouth AfricaConservationCranialLionRestorationSouth AfricaSubspecies

Identifiers

PMID39414828
PMCPMC11484747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.